Hi WAC,
Interesting development. I wonder though, how different this is from any other software company. For instance, if you go out and buy a new game - hell, I don't know what's new - but for the sake of argument, Doom, and you read on the box what the recommended reqs are, that still doesn't mean that you get to run the game to its fullest; just mostly.
I don't agree that running Vista without Aero makes it stripped down (in reality, what is intended by that remark is that it is somehow crippled - it isn't though). After all, the OS is perfectly functional without Aero effects on. It just isn't as pretty. OK, the flip thing is broken without Aero on, but you get my point.
Before I started caring too much about Vista, I had noticed that there are two labels being put on computers; Vista capable and Vista ready. I assumed (correctly) that that means just what they say. Vista ready means everything works, and capable means it mostly works, but not all the way. The specs. for running Vista are not top secret - they are pretty easy to find. I can live with that.
I am by no means a Windows apologist. However, I am realistic about computers. They are not forget and go devices like ovens. A person has to take the effort (or pay someone who will) to research the subject and make proper decisions. This is the world we live in and people will have to be willing to educate themselves on technology or simply be left behind.
Actually the best thing that I think that could happen in this instance is for the judge to say f88k off to the prosecution and sentence the computer noobs that want to stick it to MS to basic computing classes at their local community colleges.